As artificial intelligence (AI) advances, it’s raising concerns about its potential impact on human writers and artists. Some argue that AI will replace human creativity, but others see it as an opportunity to augment human abilities.
The question we should be asking is not if AI can perform certain tasks better than humans, but why AI? The answer lies in the intentions of those who create and promote AI. Some aim to demonstrate computer skills and outperform humans, while others seek to control human thought and creativity.
While AI has its uses in writing, such as catching mistakes, it lacks the soul and originality that human writers bring to their work. AI-generated essays often lack depth and insight, relying on generic answers rather than genuine thoughts.
However, AI can also be a tool for humans to improve their skills. I encourage my students to use AI to generate competition, allowing them to outperform the machine. By doing so, we can harness AI’s strengths while maintaining human creativity.
The debate about AI’s potential impact is unnecessary. We should focus on its benefits and consider how it can augment human abilities rather than replace them. As Dr. Ian Malcolm said in “Jurassic Park,” “Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should.” Let’s apply this wisdom to AI development and ensure it serves humanity’s best interests.
John A. Tures is a professor of political science at LaGrange College, where he explores the intersection of technology and society. His views are his own, and can be reached at [email protected].
Source: https://cobbcountycourier.com/2024/12/what-is-the-question-we-should-be-asking-with-ai