A recent review by UserBenchmark has left many enthusiasts stunned, suggesting that spending extra on gaming CPUs is pointless due to their limited impact on game performance. The website recommends the i5-13600K and i5-14600K over AMD’s Ryzen 7 9800X3D, which has dethroned Intel’s fastest gaming CPU, the i9-14900K, by nearly 33%. However, critics argue that this approach overlooks the actual performance differences between the CPUs.
UserBenchmark asserts that spending more on gaming CPUs is “pointless” and recommends choosing a GPU over the CPU. The review further suggests that AMD drives sales through aggressive marketing rather than delivering real-world performance, despite the Ryzen 7 9800X3D being the world’s fastest gaming CPU.
This stance has sparked controversy among enthusiasts, who point out that UserBenchmark’s argument is subjective and fails to consider the actual benefits of more powerful CPUs. In reality, a faster CPU can provide a better experience for gamers and professionals alike, especially in tasks like compiling software or rendering video content.
The review highlights the need for a balanced approach when selecting hardware components, taking into account both gaming performance and real-world usage scenarios. By considering these factors, users can make informed decisions about their budget allocation and choose the best CPU for their specific needs.
Source: https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/userbenchmark-suggests-you-buy-the-i5-13600k-over-the-ryzen-7-9800x3d-says-amd-drives-sales-with-aggressive-marketing-rather-than-real-world-performance