Vice-President JD Vance has sparked controversy by suggesting that US judges do not have authority to challenge the executive power of President Donald Trump. In a social media post, Vance wrote that judges are not allowed to control the executive branch’s legitimate power.
The comments came as the White House is facing a flurry of lawsuits aimed at stalling its agenda. A judge recently blocked members of Trump’s advisory body, the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge), from accessing sensitive US Treasury Department systems.
Vance’s remarks have been criticized by lawmakers and experts, with some arguing that judges do have authority to review executive actions and ensure they are within constitutional bounds. However, others have pointed out that the courts are facing a significant challenge in keeping up with Trump’s rapid-fire executive orders.
The issue has raised concerns about the balance of power between the executive branch and the judiciary. As one Democratic senator noted, “the most serious constitutional crisis the country has faced, certainly since Watergate.”
The controversy highlights the deep divisions within American politics, as lawmakers and politicians take sides on the issue of executive power. With the courts continuing to play a crucial role in shaping Trump’s agenda, it remains to be seen whether Vance’s comments will have a lasting impact on the debate.
Cases filed by Democrats and outside groups have already prevented several of Trump’s executive orders from going into effect, with federal judges issuing temporary blocks. However, the outcome of these cases may ultimately depend on appeals to higher courts and potentially even the US Supreme Court.
Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4gx3j5k63xo