President Trump’s approach to foreign policy is drawing criticism from experts, who say it echoes a bygone imperial era that prioritizes American interests over those of affected nations. The president’s “America First” strategy has been likened to that of William McKinley, who annexed several territories in the late 19th century.
Critics argue that Trump’s foreign policy is overly focused on commercial calculations, with local populations often being ignored or marginalized. This approach has led to concerns about potential conflicts and instability in regions such as Ukraine, Afghanistan, and the Middle East.
Historians point to the Sykes-Picot Agreement, which carved up the modern Middle East without regard for ethnic and religious communities, as a precedent for Trump’s approach. Experts also warn that Trump’s rapid-fire diplomacy could lead to grave errors due to lack of scrutiny.
Despite some analysts suggesting potential areas of cooperation with Russia and Iran, concerns about Trump’s approach remain widespread. The president’s efforts to pressure allies, such as Jordan and Egypt, have been met with resistance, highlighting the need for a more nuanced approach to international relations.
As one expert noted, “Deals that are this opaque and that are done this quickly are more vulnerable to grave errors because they are not subject to scrutiny.” With Trump’s foreign policy continuing to evolve, it remains to be seen whether his approach will prioritize American interests or those of affected nations.
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/16/world/europe/trump-redraw-world-map.html