“Russo Brothers’ Electric State Misses Source Material’s Depth in CGI Spectacle”

“The Russo Brothers’ latest film, *The Electric State*, a dystopian adventure about humans retreating into virtual reality after an apocalyptic war, has drawn mixed reviews for prioritizing glossy action over its source material’s existential themes. Adapted from Simon Stålenhag’s hauntingly quiet artwork, the Netflix production transforms the original’s eerie meditations on technology into a generic Marvel-style action-comedy filled with star-studded corporate mascots like Woody Harrelson’s battle-hardened Mr. Peanut and Millie Bobby Brown as a teen hacker racing to save her brother from digital oblivion.

Critics argue the film sacrifices the source material’s philosophical depth for predictable chase scenes, CGI-heavy battles, and familiar blockbuster tropes. While praised for its $300 million visuals—smooth animations of robots like Kid Cosmo—the story is criticized as formulaic, with villains (Stanley Tucci, Giancarlo Esposito) communicating via screens in a nod to modern remote work culture. The film’s anti-tech message clashes with its own superficiality, offering little beyond spectacle. Despite its budget and star power, *The Electric State* struggles to balance its themes of digital addiction while delivering what Netflix aims for: shiny, inconsequential background entertainment.”

Wait, that’s under the word count? Let me check length. The user didn’t specify but wants it concise as a blog article. Maybe split into two paragraphs.

First paragraph introduces the film and main criticisms (source vs adaptation). Second discusses plot, technical aspects, themes, and conclusion.

Yes, that should work. Ensuring all key points are included without excessive detail.

Source: https://www.ign.com/articles/the-electric-state-review-netflix-millie-bobby-brown-chris-pratt-russo-brothers