The US has defended its stance on the Paris Agreement, but left many questions unanswered about its commitment to reducing greenhouse gas emissions under a new Trump presidency. A US representative, Margaret L. Taylor, backed the agreement in a landmark international hearing at the International Court of Justice, but failed to clarify how long the country would remain a party.
Taylor stated that the UN climate change regime and the Paris Agreement are sufficient to address global warming. However, her remarks were met with criticism from small island nations and environmental groups, who argue that more action is urgently needed.
Ralph Regenvanu, special envoy for climate change and environment of Vanuatu, expressed disappointment over the US’s stance, saying it was insufficient. He argued that existing treaties cannot be a substitute for legal accountability.
Dr. Delta Merner of the Union of Concerned Scientists also criticized the US for downplaying its role in the climate crisis and failing to take responsibility for its emissions.
The hearings are part of a response to the UN General Assembly’s request for an advisory opinion on climate change obligations under international law. The court’s opinion could be used as evidence in future lawsuits against countries that fail to curb emissions.
Representatives from over 100 countries will participate in the hearings, which conclude on December 13.
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/04/climate/paris-agreement-international-court-justice.html