The Porterville Irrigation District has ended its groundwater management agreement with the city of Porterville after a contentious meeting, sparking outrage among local growers. The decision to form its own groundwater agency is part of efforts to address growing tensions over water management in the region.
The partnership, established just two months ago, aimed to manage area groundwater and meet state requirements under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). However, disagreements arose over the composition of a proposed groundwater sustainability agency. Growers wanted representation from their ranks, while the irrigation district preferred its own members.
“Everything seemed fine, and now things have changed,” said dairyman Matt Kidder. “You even voted to move ahead with the city. You want the power. That’s the problem.”
Sean Geivet, general manager for the irrigation district, stated that separating from the city would allow the district to tailor its own agency. However, Vice Mayor Ed McKervey accused the board of seeking power and questioned their motives.
Growers also expressed concerns over transparency and representation in the current management structure. “We came up with the rules that most people liked,” said Armando Leal. “But it seems like you’re doing things differently than anyone else.”
The decision to form its own agency comes as the region struggles to comply with SGMA requirements, which mandate aquifers be brought into balance by 2040. Squabbles and lawsuits have centered on the southeastern portion of the subbasin where some growers are blamed for overpumping.
With the city and irrigation district likely to form their own groundwater agencies, the Tule subbasin GSA count will reach 13. This development raises questions about the future of water management in the region and whether new agencies can effectively address growing concerns.
Source: https://gvwire.com/2025/04/13/porterville-irrigation-district-kills-partnership-amid-accusations-of-power-mongering