A juror at Harvey Weinstein’s Manhattan retrial complained to the judge about “playground stuff” by other jurors, raising friction in the deliberation process. The juror, a 25-year-old IT specialist, reported overhearing others discussing another member of the jury group, which he believed was misconduct. Despite his concerns, Justice Curtis Farber denied a mistrial motion and told the man that there was no legal basis to excuse him.
The complaint occurred on Friday afternoon, as the jury began deliberating on Weinstein’s fate after six weeks of testimony. The jurors had asked to continue their discussions but sent a note to the judge requesting an end for the day. They were dismissed for the weekend, with some jurors appearing antsy and others struggling to focus.
Weinstein is charged with two counts of first-degree criminal sexual act and one count of third-degree rape, stemming from his 2020 conviction in Manhattan. He was subsequently convicted in Los Angeles and sentenced to 16 years in prison. The case has been marked by controversy and tension, including the overturned Manhattan conviction and the #MeToo movement’s impact on the trial.
Weinstein’s lawyers had moved for a mistrial again after the juror complained about his fellow jurors’ behavior, but Justice Farber rejected the motion, citing the lack of evidence and the man’s vague statements. The judge also declined to dismiss the aggrieved juror, stating that he had taken an oath to fulfill his duties.
The trial continues, with some jurors appearing uneasy and others struggling to focus on the complex case. As the deliberations continue, observers are watching closely for any signs of disruption or irregularity that could impact the outcome of the trial.
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/06/nyregion/harvey-weinstein-jury.html