Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is being increasingly used in US courts, sparking concerns about its impact on the justice system. Despite early stumbles, judges, lawyers, and parties involved in cases are leveraging GenAI for research, appeals, and self-expression.
According to Daniel Linna, a professor at Northwestern Pritzker School of Law, GenAI is widely used behind the scenes, with judges often keeping it under wraps. However, its potential benefits cannot be ignored. For instance, a digital proxy created by Chris Pelkey’s sister, Stacey Wales, addressed an Arizona courtroom during his sentencing, leaving a lasting impression on the judge.
GenAI has also been utilized in numerous US legal cases, with some lawyers praising its time-saving capabilities and accuracy. Attorney Stephen Schwartz notes that GenAI can be a helpful tool, but emphasizes the importance of verifying its accuracy to avoid false citations and errors.
On the flip side, early instances of GenAI error-ridden petitions have resulted in significant fines and damages. Self-represented litigants may also rely on GenAI without proper training or oversight, increasing the risk of legal mistakes.
Law professor Linna sees GenAI as a transformative tool that can enhance access to justice for underserved populations. However, its integration into the judicial system requires careful consideration. Judges must be technologically up-to-date and trained in AI to ensure accurate and fair decisions.
As GenAI continues to evolve, it’s essential to weigh its benefits against potential risks. With proper guidance and oversight, this technology has the potential to streamline court processes and improve outcomes for all parties involved.
Source: https://techxplore.com/news/2025-06-justice-stake-generative-ai-courtroom.html