Austrian newspaper Kurier’s interview with 95-year-old film legend Clint Eastwood has sparked outrage and raised questions about the state of cinema journalism. The interview, which saw Eastwood call out younger directors for “buck[ing] up,” was deemed a viral sensation, but it also left the publication facing criticism.
Kurier’s own statement admitted that it had misled readers by describing the interview as a “birthday profile” rather than an actual interview. The paper claimed to have ensured “koshar” quote-gathering methods, but this came after the publication revealed Sereda’s credentials, including her membership in the defunct Hollywood Foreign Press Association (HFPA).
The HFPA was discredited in 2023 due to allegations of unprofessionalism, bribery, and misconduct. Many film journalists rely on access granted at film festivals, which is often brief, chaotic, and non-exclusive.
Eastwood’s comments have sparked debate about the role of access in journalism. While some publications may be willing to accept roundtable interviews without questioning their authenticity, others are more discerning. Eastwood himself has called out those who engage in “sycophancy” and “dribble.”
The controversy raises questions about the state of film journalism and the need for greater transparency and accountability. As the industry continues to evolve, it’s essential that journalists prioritize fact-checking and rigorous reporting over access and celebrity connections.
With Eastwood’s interview now sparking a heated debate, one thing is clear: the film world will never be the same again.
Source: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2025/jun/04/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-clint-eastwoods-interview-debacle-reveals-bleak-truths-about-film-journalism