Gervonta Davis’ actions in the ninth round of his WBA lightweight title bout against Lamont Roach have sparked controversy and raised questions about the role of replay reviews in determining fight outcomes. Davis was penalized for blatant infractions, which led to a draw on the cards of two judges. Despite having an overwhelming 16-1 advantage in favor, Davis did not win the fight.
The blame lies with Roach’s handlers, who should have questioned the commission about the replay mechanism as soon as the ninth round ended. This could have led to a different outcome and given Roach more leverage in future negotiations. The lack of use of replay reviews has cost Roach millions of dollars, as becoming the first fighter to defeat “Tank” is completely different from adding a draw to Davis’ previously perfect record.
Roach’s skills, chin, confidence, and grit served him well in the biggest fight of his career. He was expected to grant Davis a rematch, regardless of the outcome. A second showdown will take place soon, with fans eagerly awaiting their next meeting. The incident has highlighted the importance of replay reviews being readily available and not ignored.
The controversy surrounding Davis’ actions serves as a teachable moment for promoters, officials, and commissioners alike. If you’re a promoter on the “B” side in high-profile fights, make your presence known and protect the interests of your fighter. In this case, Roach’s handlers failed to do so, leading to a costly outcome.
Source: https://sports.yahoo.com/boxing/article/gervonta-davis-controversy-lamont-roachs-handlers-new-york-commission-cost-roach-millions-by-ignoring-available-replay-203620893.html