The HBO series Dune: Prophecy is a disappointing follow-up to Denis Villeneuve’s film, focusing too much on the intrigue of palace politics while neglecting the impact on ordinary people. The show’s writers have created two sides that are equally zealous in their pursuit of power, making it hard to root for either the Bene Gesserit or the Emperor.
The series starts by introducing Valya Harkonnen, a ruthless leader who will stop at nothing to return her family to power, and Desmond Hart, a soldier transformed by his encounter with a giant sandworm. Their conflicting interests set off a chain of events that raises questions about the morality of their actions. However, as the show progresses, it becomes clear that Valya’s goals are driven by self-preservation rather than a desire for the greater good.
The Bene Gesserit sisterhood is portrayed as a powerful and complex organization, but its intentions are ultimately revealed to be selfish. The show tries to emulate the complexity of Game of Thrones, but its lack of character development and shallow power struggle make it hard to become invested in the story.
Despite hints at a larger narrative, Dune: Prophecy feels like a series that is still finding its footing. With only six episodes available, the show’s creators have neglected to include any ordinary people whose lives might be affected by the conflict, making its consequences seem insignificant. The review of the show concludes with “Long may the Bene Gesserit reign,” highlighting the problem – we’re rooting for the wrong side no matter which one we choose.
Source: https://slate.com/culture/2024/11/dune-prophecy-hbo-max-show-review-emily-watson.html