Research suggests a counterintuitive path to well-being: stop chasing exceptional achievements and aim for good, ordinary experiences. Studies on maximizers vs. satisficers show that individuals who maximize often report more regret, less happiness, and more depressive symptoms than those who prioritize “good enough.” Being average doesn’t mean being apathetic; it means valuing the ordinary.
Ordinary experiences can produce as much happiness as extraordinary ones, especially when they accumulate into a coherent life story. Treating repeatables as assets can compound into satisfaction faster than sporadic luxury. Choosing a right-sized environment where you can contribute and feel competent can also boost happiness.
The perfectionism problem is a major concern, as socially prescribed perfectionism tracks with higher anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation. Prioritizing intrinsic goals over extrinsic ones can lead to higher well-being. The values shift that matters most is what we strive for, not how high we rank.
Embracing “good enough” means making decisions that aren’t perfect but get the job done, designing for ordinary joy, choosing a right-sized environment, and ditching performative perfection. This reframing can have a wider impact by creating systems that celebrate consistency and contribution, rather than just rewarding outliers. By choosing the kind version instead of the best version, you’ll be happier and more fulfilled.
Source: https://vegoutmag.com/news/n-psychologists-explain-why-being-average-might-be-the-key-to-long-term-happiness