The live-action remake of Disney’s Lilo & Stitch has sparked controversy over its altered ending. Fans are criticizing the decision to remove Gantu and have Nani give up guardianship of Lilo, with some calling it a sign of “encroaching fascism.” The change ignores Nani’s agency as an individual, instead portraying her as solely focused on caring for Lilo.
Disney likely made this change in response to discussions about parentification of elder siblings. However, critics argue that it glosses over the historical context of Native Hawaiian families being separated by state policies. Some see the film as propaganda for social services, similar to Marvel movies and police procedurals.
Despite this backlash, not everyone is unhappy with the remake. One user pointed out that Lilo remains in a trusted neighborhood guardian instead of a stranger or group home. The mid-credits sequence also shows Nani using technology to stay connected with Lilo while she’s away at school.
However, some fans are still upset over changes such as Nani leaving Oahu to study marine biology. This has led to criticism that the film is portraying unrealistic expectations for Native Hawaiians seeking education and career opportunities on the mainland.
Source: https://www.vulture.com/article/lilo-and-stitch-live-action-ending.html