The controversy surrounding Milwaukee Brewers rookie Jacob Misiorowski’s selection to the All-Star Game has raised questions about the league’s approach to promoting its top players. Despite Misiorowski being chosen after other starting pitchers turned down spots, some argue that he didn’t earn his place through traditional means.
Six All-Stars who started on Saturday also withdrew from the game, citing a desire to minimize their risk of injury on one day’s rest. Boston Red Sox manager Alex Cora suggested changing the schedule or giving players more time off before the game. However, this may not be feasible given the league’s promotional needs.
Players like San Francisco Giants reliever Tyler Rogers feel snubbed by Misiorowski’s selection, as they believe it dilutes the honor of participating in the All-Star Game. Meanwhile, players who have spent years trying to make an All-Star team feel they were overlooked.
The situation highlights labor tensions between the league and players’ union. While the owners are more focused on salary-cap prep than addressing pitching injuries, the league deserves credit for promoting Misiorowski effectively as a top summer showcase.
Misiorowski’s selection has sparked debate about whether the league is lowering its standards too much. With five starts under his belt, he will undoubtedly attract viewers and revenue for the league. Nevertheless, some argue that this approach undermines the value of participating in the All-Star Game.
The situation serves as a reminder that players’ participation is crucial to making the game compelling. The league must find ways to incentivize players financially or otherwise to ensure that the All-Star Game remains an attractive showcase for baseball’s top talent.
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6492094/2025/07/14/mlb-all-star-pitchers-jacob-misiorowski