Southeastern Conference (SEC) commissioner Greg Sankey recently sparked controversy by criticizing the Big 12 and ACC conferences, as well as being accused of playing catch with power over college football. The criticism stems from the SEC’s push to shape the future of college sports, including a proposed 16-team playoff format that could favor its own member schools.
The plan, which Sankey supports, includes four automatic bids for the top two conferences (Big Ten and SEC) and two automatic bids for the next two (ACC and Big 12). The remaining three spots would be awarded to non-power conference champions. However, critics argue that this system could lead to the Big Ten and SEC having an unfair advantage, as they already have more resources and talent.
Sankey defended his approach, stating that he has a responsibility to push for changes that benefit the sport and the SEC membership. He also acknowledged that not everyone may agree with his views, but believes in his ability to provide perspective and information to help guide decisions.
The controversy is part of a larger issue surrounding college sports governance, including concerns about antitrust exemptions and congressional oversight. U.S. Representative Brendan Boyle has threatened to hold congressional hearings if the SEC and Big Ten pursue their plans without careful consideration.
As college sports leaders navigate these complex issues, it remains to be seen whether Sankey’s approach will ultimately benefit the sport or lead to further controversy.
Source: https://www.si.com/college-football/sec-greg-sankey-reshape-college-sports-bad-guy-blowback