The recent debate over James Gunn’s assertion that Superman is an “immigrant” highlights the complexities of cultural symbolism in America. Gunn, now headlining DC’s cinematic future, stated that Superman’s inherent kindness is a political statement, and he spoke plainly about the film’s themes. However, his comments triggered outrage, with some accusing him of politicizing the character.
Former TV Superman Dean Cain accused Gunn of making a mistake, but it’s actually a misreading of the character’s origin story. Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster, Superman’s creators, crafted him as a projection of pure Americanness, not an outsider. Their intention was to create a version of America where alieness could be easily discarded via an outfit change.
Today’s immigration politics run on the same fantasy – the myth of the “good” immigrant who is quiet, grateful, and easy to assimilate. This notion has been perpetuated by politicians and cultural symbols alike. Superman’s story serves as a metaphor for this fantasy, where wealthier nations prefer those who blend in and rarely challenge the systems that demand their silence.
The debate over Superman’s legacy reveals the complexity of American identity politics. While Gunn’s comments sparked outrage, they also highlight the need to confront the myth of assimilationism and its impact on immigration policies. As cultural symbols continue to be repurposed for self-congratulatory visions of America, it’s essential to critically examine their meanings and implications.
Note: I simplified the article while maintaining the essential information and tone of the original text. The title is concise and accurately reflects the content.
Source: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/jul/20/superman-rightwing-culture-war