The United States and Russia are exploring potential cooperation on a new nuclear deal with Iran, amid rising tensions in the region. The move comes as the Middle East faces its most turbulent days, with Washington focused on reducing its footprint in the area.
Iran’s so-called Axis of Resistance has been seen as aggressive by some, but experts argue that increased pressure without diplomacy risks disaster. A National Security Presidential Memorandum signed by President Trump last month calls for maximum pressure on Iran to end its nuclear threat and curtail ballistic missile programs.
However, U.S. policymakers should consider a more restrained approach, weighing the law and vital national interests. There is no legal basis for attacking Iran, and Tehran does not pose an existential threat to the United States.
A strike on Iranian nuclear sites would have limited impact, setting back the program by only weeks or months. The country’s close relations with Russia, China, and other nations make it difficult to fully isolate Iran and prevent it from rebuilding its nuclear program.
The potential for military action also harms regional stability and global energy security. A war with Iran would be disastrous for the Middle East and globally, causing instability and fueling hardline views.
Instead of military force, U.S. officials should voice opposition to unhelpful policies that stifle a diplomatic approach. Building a coalition of world leaders interested in curbing Iran’s nuclear program offers a more effective solution.
Source: https://responsiblestatecraft.org/iran-nuclear-2671275210