The origin of SARS-CoV-2 is a pressing question that has garnered significant attention since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, with the implementation of various measures to combat outbreaks, this inquiry is now taking a backseat. The question remains crucial because it can inform how we regulate research facilities and safeguards, as well as guide our approach to pathogen surveillance, wildlife trafficking, and social security measures.
Scientists have differing opinions on whether the virus originated in a lab or naturally in bats. While investigating its origins is essential, experts acknowledge that it may be more challenging than initially thought. The COVID-19 pandemic has led to significant advancements in these areas, making the origin of SARS-CoV-2 less critical. Instead, the focus should be on how we can learn from the experience and build upon it.
Science communication has also highlighted the limitations of human knowledge. Even with significant progress in various fields, there are still gaps in our understanding. The example of AI models is a stark reminder that not everything can be fully explained by current science. This raises questions about the social character of scientific knowledge, where faith and trust play crucial roles.
When encountering complex concepts, people tend to rely on trusted sources or authority figures for answers. However, this approach can lead to problems when we don’t know or choose to overlook the boundaries between science and faith. The pursuit of a definitive answer can sometimes overshadow more practical solutions.
Source: https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/notebook-the-social-character-of-scientific-knowledge/article69005116.ece